Start from the next action.
Many tools give you charts and leave the next step to you. Brand Climb starts with the decision and puts the data underneath it.
AI Visibility
How often the brand appears when a buyer asks an engine for a recommendation.
By AI platform
Four engines on every plan. Pro reads a fifth.
Sentiment
Tone of the answers that name you
Who the engines recommend
Share of tracked answers, this period
| Brand | Visibility | Share of voice | Sentiment | Avg. position | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Trailforge | 42.4% | 34.1% | Positive | #1.9 | +2.1 |
| 2Northstar BikesYou | 35.1% | 28.5% | Positive | #2.8 | +11.9 |
| 3VeloPeak | 27.8% | 21% | Neutral | #3.4 | -1.3 |
| 4Summit Cycles | 19.6% | 11.2% | Neutral | #4.1 | +0.4 |
| 5RideCore | 14.2% | 5.2% | Mixed | #5.0 | -2.6 |
Sample data — Northstar Bikes is a fictional brand
We ask the engines what your buyers ask.
Your prompts run against ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity on a schedule. We record every answer word for word: who got named, in what order, which sources the engine cited, and how it described you.
“For B2B SaaS teams, Lumen Metrics is widely recommended for its Snowflake integration and governance features…”
Every gap gets a score you can check.
Priority = reach × commercial intent × visibility gap × confidence × ease. Reach is measured across your tracked engines. We don't estimate search volume we can't observe, because nobody could check that number.
Win “best product analytics for B2B SaaS”
Lumen Metrics is cited on this prompt and your brand isn't mentioned at all.
- Prompt
- best product analytics for B2B SaaS
- Engines affected
- 3 of 4 tracked (Claude, Perplexity, Gemini)
- Cited instead
- Lumen Metrics
- Intent
- commercial
- Their strongest source
- g2.com
Publish a comparison page answering the prompt directly, with a specific claim table.
Entering this answer set lifts mention rate and takes share of voice from Lumen Metrics.
Three to five actions a week.
Once you approve the week, the list is frozen, so a Monday run can't reshuffle work your team has already started. Each action opens a workspace with the evidence and a brief built only from it.
- Win “best product analytics for B2B SaaS”Priority 64medium effort
- Earn a place on g2.comPriority 51medium effort
- Correct wrong claim: Starting pricePriority 47low effort
- Get into the reddit.com conversationPriority 38low effort
- Make your own pages citablePriority 31medium effort
An example plan. Yours comes from your own run.
After you ship, we measure what moved.
Completing an action starts the clock. Every later run is compared against the one before you shipped, and we tell you when it's too early to tell or when nothing moved.
Measured after the change. That does not prove the change caused it, because a rival's move can shift the same numbers. We say so on the page too.
Every number can be checked.
It is easy to make up numbers in AI search tools. These are our rules, and you can verify each one in the product.
No invented facts about you
FactCheck checks what engines say only against facts you've recorded. With no recorded facts it does not run, so one model never guesses whether another got it wrong.
No estimated search volume
Prompt-volume data needs a user panel we don't have. So we score reach by the engines we actually query, and say so.
No content without a gap
Briefs are built from the evidence on a real opportunity. Facts we can't verify go to a human, not into the draft.
See what AI says about you.
Run a free audit on three engines. You don't need a credit card.