Start from the next action, not another dashboard.
Most tools hand you charts and let you work out what to do. Brand Climb runs it the other way round: the decision first, and the data underneath it as proof.
We ask the engines what your buyers ask.
Your prompts run against ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity on a schedule. We record every answer verbatim — who got named, in what order, which sources the engine cited, and how it described you.
“For B2B SaaS teams, Lumen Metrics is widely recommended for its Snowflake integration and governance features…”
Every gap gets a score you can argue with.
Priority = reach × commercial intent × visibility gap × confidence × ease. Reach is measured across your tracked engines. We don't estimate search volume we can't observe — a number nobody can check isn't evidence.
Win “best product analytics for B2B SaaS”
Lumen Metrics is cited on this prompt and your brand isn't mentioned at all.
- Prompt
- best product analytics for B2B SaaS
- Engines affected
- 3 of 4 tracked (Claude, Perplexity, Gemini)
- Cited instead
- Lumen Metrics
- Intent
- commercial
- Their strongest source
- g2.com
Publish a comparison page answering the prompt directly, with a specific claim table.
Entering this answer set lifts mention rate and takes share of voice from Lumen Metrics.
Three to five actions a week. Not a backlog.
Approve the week and it freezes — a Monday run can't reshuffle work your team already picked up. Each action opens a workspace with the evidence and a brief built strictly from it.
- Win “best product analytics for B2B SaaS”Priority 64medium effort
- Earn a place on g2.comPriority 51medium effort
- Correct wrong claim: Starting pricePriority 47low effort
- Get into the reddit.com conversationPriority 38low effort
- Make your own pages citablePriority 31medium effort
An example plan. Yours comes from your own run.
After you ship, we measure what moved.
Completing an action starts the clock. Every later run is compared against the one before you shipped — and we say plainly when it's too early to tell, or when nothing moved.
Measured after, not proof of cause — a rival's move can shift the same numbers. We say so on the page too.
A number you can't check isn't insight.
AI-search tools are easy to fake. These are the lines we hold, and you can verify each one inside the product.
No invented facts about you
FactCheck judges what engines say only against facts you've recorded. With no ground truth it refuses to run, rather than have one model guess whether another lied.
No estimated search volume
Prompt-volume data needs a user panel we don't have. So we score reach by the engines we actually query, and say so.
No content without a gap
Briefs are built from the evidence on a real opportunity. Facts we can't verify go to a human, not into the draft.
See what AI says about you.
Run a free audit against four engines. No credit card.
